Again it is not that the Three Forms of Unity deny
adoption. But they simply move past it
quickly as a given or merge it into justification. The Heidelberg Catechism assumes this
doctrine as the phrase “my Father” is used in many places such Question 1 or
more prominently HC#26 where the answer states, “That the eternal Father of our
Lord Jesus Christ . . . is for the sake of Christ, his Son, my God and my
Father”. But the force of HC#26 is about
the providential control of the God the Father Almighty, and is not
specifically addressing adoption.
Clearly it is believed, but not explained. The Belgic Confession has no chapter on
Adoption, and it is only briefly mentioned in the chapter on Baptism (34) as
God being our Father.
The Westminster is unique in its emphasis on Adoption. The French Confession of Calvin does not
discuss it, the Second Helvetic Confession of Bullinger does not discuss
it. Even Turretin’s Elenctic Theology
does not have a separate section for adoption.
Rather there it is discussed as a subset of justification. And the famous “ordo salutis” as advocated by
Louis Berkhof does not include adoption.
And so it would seem flowing out of the Dutch creeds, adoption has not
been stressed.
However, the Westminster does seem to put Adoption into the
ordo salutis. The chapters of the
Westminster go from Effectual Calling to Justification to Adoption to
Sanctification and eventually to Perseverance to the end. The Westminster stresses it by giving it is
own chapter. And it points out that
adoption is a free grace and is a legal action that by which we are given the
liberties and privileges of being a child of God. This beautiful chapter in the Westminster is
only one article, but by going against the flow of Reformed Creeds and giving
adoption its own chapter makes it an important chapter.
I think you could probably argue that adoption still does
not get the emphasis that it needs in the Reformed world today. However, only the Westminster can rightly
claim to have given adoption a place of importance and stress.
Thanks Lee
ReplyDeleteAdoption seems to come through in Heidelberg Catechism #33 as well as in the Canons of Dort, First Head, Articles 7 & 10, and the Fifth Head, under article 6
I don't think that adoption is denied in any of the Reformed creeds, but even in HC #33 it is not the emphasis. The emphasis is that Jesus Christ is the Son of God by his nature, and we only through grace for Christ's sake. I do believe the point is the divine nature of Jesus, not so much our adoption.
ReplyDeleteThe same is true for the Canons, which were obviously written to handle other doctrinal problems than adoption.
Ultimately the Reformed tradition as a whole has not focused so much on adoption. I think it an under emphasized theological point.
Agreed, adoption is not the emphasis in any of those points
ReplyDelete